Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jonathan Hurley <jhurley1@************.EDU>
Subject: Re: New Physad Metamagic Power
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:40:05 -0500
Adam Treloar[SMTP:guardian@*******.DIALIX.COM.AU] wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Jonathan Hurley wrote:
>
> > This reminded me of the power I just wrote up for a physad in my
campaign:
> > Weapon merge.
> >
> > Weapon Merge: Cost:0.5 Effects: The physical adept with this power has
the
> > ability to 'project' a limited part of his awareness into a weapon he
is
> > holding - melee or ranged. It takes a simple action for the adept to
merge
> > with the weapon. Once merged, he is more aware of the weapon, giving
him a
> > -2 bonus to any tests taken with the weapon. There is a significant
> > disadvantage, however; any actions taken that do not directly involve
the
> > use of the weapon are at a +2 penalty. Furthermore, it takes a simple
> > action to unmerge from the weapon safely.
>
> Not too bad... Except I'd maybe change it to -1/+1, or negation of one
> penalty (eg visibility, wounds etc) against +2 or +3. Otherwise sounds
> pretty reasonable.

If you like. But a -1 bonus can be obtained with a laser sight. This is
intended to be an equivalent to smartgun links/enhanced aim spells. I feel
that the +2 penalty balances out the fact that *any* weapon can be merged
with. Wound penalties can be ignored by a physad anyway, as can many of the
vismods.

[snip]

> > If the weapon takes damage, the physical adept must resist
> > stun damage with willpower, against a damage code determined by the
> > gamemaster, based on the amount of damage taken by the weapon. (If a
sword
> > is chipped by hitting a metal-laced bone, it might be Light damage,
while a
> > baseball bat splintering over a troll's cyberskull would be Deadly).
While
> > merged, the weapon is treated as being included in the physical adept's
> > aura for spell-targeting purposes (i.e. the physical adept's aura
> > 'surrounds' the weapon while the physical adept is merged with it.)
>
> It's a good idea, but how many of us use weapon damage rules of any kind?
> Except where acid-based spells and effects are concerned, of course.

Roleplaying effect, more than anything else. That's why I leave it up to
the Gm's discretion

--
Quicksilver rides again
--------------
Those who would give up a little freedom for security
deserve neither freedom nor security
-Benjamin Franklin
Yeah, I have Attention Deficit Dis - Hey, look at that butterfly!
Jonathan Hurley (mailto:jhurley1@************.edu)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.