Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Lehlan Decker <decker@****.FSU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Least Favorite Sourcebook
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 10:08:25 -0500
On Fri, Dec 12, 1997 at 07:53:35AM -0700, David Buehrer wrote:
> David Buehrer wrote:
> /
> / Which sourcebook is your *least* favorite, and why?
>
> R2.
>
> This is not meant as a slam to Mr. Szeto. Jon, you did a great job
> writing R2 and you have my respect and admiration.
>
> R2 was a let down because I had such high expectations. I wanted a
> simple and quick vehicle combat system that wasn't abstract. I
> wanted a vehicle modification/design system with twice as many
> options as in RBB. I wanted a long list of vehicles to play with. I
> wanted good and realistic pictures (in the RBB there is a picture of
> a plane that can't possible fly).
>
> In all fairness to Jon and FASA I'm going to wait a few more weeks
> and then try to read R2 without any preconcieved notions of what it
> should be. So my opinion may change :)
>
> (Hey Jon, have you ever considered writing a companion for R2? One
> with optional vehicle combat rules, more design options, more
> vehicles, and thumbnail pictures of the vehicles? :)
>

Excellent idea. I'd be willing to shell out another $15 for
more detail. I'm sure there are many people on the list who
could email ideas, suggestions, etc. :)
If not, it sounds like an idea for netbook. :)



--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Lehlan Decker 644-4534 Systems Development
decker@****.fsu.edu http://www.scri.fsu.edu/~decker
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Time is the best teacher. Unfortunately it kills all of its students.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.