Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Magic Questions
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 12:33:38 EST
In a message dated 97-12-14 11:38:32 EST, woneal@*******.NET writes:

> > Or alternatively, make a Hypersenses spell, that gives me Astral
> > perception?
> >
> I think this is probably beyond what spells can do. At least in my
> own
> game I would rule it so. Purely on grounds of game balance.
>
I have to get into this....sorry...."Purely on grounds of game
balance."???????

How about, "making someone forever live with their handicap/restriction and
therefore not allowing them to grow beyond it. Just for the record, and
though most people will say that module-sourced spells are not canon, it would
strike me as Odd that FASA would put such a thing into the game with their
printed logo on it and their ability to copyright such....but I
digress...there is a spell called "Sight" in a module, I believe it's in
either Super Tuesday (I'm probably wrong, I can't place the module) which
allows for the caster (who is blind) to have the abilities of "Normal
Sight"...completely unaugmented. It was created by a Ghoul magician to
overcome his restriction.

Why couldn't a Sorceror Adept come up with an "Astral Sight" spell. the
"Sight" spell mentioned above has a "Light" drain btw, IIRC.
"Astral Sight"
would be far more complex, and could readily be done with a "+3 Drain
Category" (for Extreme Complexity) and all it would do is grant "unaugmented
Astral Sight".

You could do LOTS beyond that.

Put it on an anchoring effect (say a pair of glasses or a monacle), then you
could do spells like "Nightvision" (Low Light) "Thermal Sight"
(Thermographic)
"Starsight" (Ultraviolet) "Acuity" (Optic Magnification...level it to
work
just like the cyber implant so that a +1 is Moderate, +2 is Serious, +3 is
Deadly (which is a bit much IMHO), "X-Ray" (which is mentioned in the book).

Come on, time to let an obstacle be a challenge, not a chain.
-K

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.