Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: John E Pederson <lobo1@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Recoil and Strength)
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:44:02 -0500
On Wed, 17 Dec 1997 20:13:55 -0500 Jeremiah Stevens
<jeremiah@********.EDU> writes:

>Usually comparing body and strength works. If the body is higher, then
the
>person is overweight, if strength is higher, the person is considered
well
>built for their weight. Thus a person with B 5 and S 1 would be a big
fat
>wimp, while someone with a B 2 and S 5 would be a scrawny little tough
guy.


Not quite that simple: Body doesn't relate only to size. It also relates
to endurance, general health (in resistance to toxins and pathogens), and
damage resistance ability. Size figures partly into toxin resistance, and
damage resistance, but a guy who is seriously... umm... "weight inclined"
;) isn't likely to have much in the way of endurance... That Body: 5 says
otherwise.

And it is possible (though highly improbable) to have strength without
endurance to match.


--
John Pederson "Oh my God! They killed Kenny!"
aka Canthros, shapeshifter-mage --South Park
lobo1@****.com canthros1@***.com john.e.pederson@***********.edu
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/4864 ICQ UIN 3190186

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.