Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: SRII Lethality
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 12:08:17 +0100
Zixx said on 0:35/19 Dec 97...

> I know some who do. Many systems seperate hitting from doing damage (Kult,
> Starwars and Midgard come to mind). So basicly you roll to figure out if
> you hit (can be hard or easy), then you roll again to figure out how much
> damage you do (*not* liked to your skill). This way, *if* J. Random
> Squatter hits you, it's just as bad as if it was Pam, The Sam.

Unfortunately that way of determining damage is also unrealistic in that
you still do the same damage even if you made a brilliant shot. In SR, the
better you shoot the more damage you do, which penalizes shooters with
little or no skill, while in systems where skill isn't tied to damage,
highly skilled shooters get no bonus that.

It should be possible to find a middle ground, but only at the expense of
speed of play. For example, what could be done is see if a hit is obtained
(and count the successes) and then roll a number of dice equal to the
weapon's Power Level against a TN of, say, 4. The successes from this are
then_also_ applied to stage up the damage.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
It's crap but we love it!
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.