Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: John E Pederson <lobo1@****.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT] South Park (was: Merry Christmas)
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 16:05:24 -0500
On Tue, 23 Dec 1997 10:41:46 -0700 Tony Glinka <porthos@**.NETCOM.COM>
writes:

>> /
>> / BTW: Anyone seen the South Park christmas episode? REALLY sick and
>> / disgusting, but oh so amusing :]
>>
>> That ruled! Comedy central used to (and maybe still does) have a
>> 50meg avi of the episode on their website. If you can, check it
>> out. (Warning, the episode is somewhat... violent :)
>
>They still have a Real Video version of the episode of "Spirit of
>Christmas" on their site. Much easier to deal with than the 50 meg
>version, but the quality is not as good. This is different from this
>year's Xmas episode, for those who haven't seen either one.


Warning: "The Spirit of Christmas" is nearly guaranteed to offend you,
irregardless of religious or cultural background.

That said, it is also truly funny:)

"Cartmann, don't say ********* in front of Jesus!"

>But to make this a bit more On Topic (like that is possible :] ), do
you
>think Mr. Hankey was a Toxic Spirit? Or maybe something else, much much
>sicker.


I would think some sort of twisted Trickster spirit, myself:)


>(And yes, Bull, the episode was really disgusting, but so amusing
>it had to be seen twice.)


You watched it *twice*?! You need therapy ;)


>Hiiiiidey Hohhh!
>Tony


--
John Pederson Canthros, the shapeshifter-mage
<<-------------------------------------------------------------->>
I had rather believe all the fables in the legends and the Talmud
and the Alcoran, than that this universal frame is without a mind.
--Francis Bacon
<<-------------------------------------------------------------->>
lobo1@****.com canthros1@***.com john.e.pederson@***********.edu
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/4864 ICQ UIN 3190186

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.