Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: John E Pederson <lobo1@****.COM>
Subject: Re: [OT] South Park (was: Merry Christmas)
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 21:26:41 -0500
On Tue, 23 Dec 1997 20:02:32 EST Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM> writes:
<snip>
>> That said, it is also truly funny:)
>> "Cartmann, don't say ********* in front of Jesus!"
>
>Oh they didn't...


Oh, yes they did... The short features Santa Claus and Jesus Christ
fighting ala Street Fighter -- with Stan and Co. cheering them on:)



<<Oh no, he was a Spirit of Man, complete with aroma-therapy options a
"Glamour" power...maybe that would make him "Faerie" type beings,
which
are even harder to examine under such masterful taxidermy...but who would
want to study "Mr. Hankey" anyway???? It was bad enough with that
"Christmas Kiss".>>


Just a feeling, but I don't see Mr. Hanky as being one of the "Fair"
Folk:)


>
>> I would think some sort of twisted Trickster spirit, myself:)
>
>Yeah, but he's a good hearted little shit... ;)


Oi! A Pun!
"Dude, this is pretty f***ed up right here."


>> >(And yes, Bull, the episode was really disgusting, but so amusing
>> >it had to be seen twice.)
>> You watched it *twice*?! You need therapy ;)
>
>I am absolutely envious...
>
>> >Hiiiiidey Hohhh!
>> >Tony
>
>And KENNY DIDN"T DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


They foreshadowed it, though... They didn't mention him in the spot
before hand.

"Officer Barbrady, is it wrong to be a Jew on Christmas?"
"... Yes."
"******!!!!"

--
John Pederson Canthros, the shapeshifter-mage
<<-------------------------------------------------------------->>
I had rather believe all the fables in the legends and the Talmud
and the Alcoran, than that this universal frame is without a mind.
--Francis Bacon
<<-------------------------------------------------------------->>
lobo1@****.com canthros1@***.com john.e.pederson@***********.edu
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/4864 ICQ UIN 3190186

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.