Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Logan Graves <Fenris>" <logan1@*****.INTERCOM.NET>
Subject: Re: Rigger 2 and Remote Control Decks
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 1997 09:49:39 -0500
In our last episode, Ereskanti wrote in reply to:
>
> > Aaron's post:
> > But...how intrusive is a cranial deck into reality? Can I walk
> > down the street and have a "window" in my field of view from the
> > roto-drone overhead? Can I be in a firefight and use my action to
> > give one of my drones an order? How "out of it" are you while in
> > Captain's Chair mode?
>
> There are no major rules concerning this given. I believe that
> "rigging" takes as much of your "perceptual concentration" as
> "decking" does. My favorite would be to operate in 'cool mode' using
> an Encephalon. "Captain's Chair" mode -might- be possible in this
> fashion, but I am not certain.

I've often wonder about this too. We play that if the rigger doesn't
have some sort of remote camera or speaker-system to split his
concentration between, he can't really interact with the players in his
vehicle (a comm link counts, too). But I haven't purchased R2, yet.

What does VR2 say about it? Anyone (else) feel brave or daring enough
to 'schlogg' those rules for an answer?

> > "Weapons? Who needs weapons? I just use vehicles..."
>
> Very thinking....1 point of karma....just for the fun of it... ;)

Hmmm, 1 Karma Point. Letsee ;9 That'd be ".9" to Good Karma which
rounds to a "1" and ".1" to the K-Pool which rounds ...

--Fenris (rubbin' a bit of salt)
_______________________________________________logan1@*****.intercom.net
(>) "Seeing as I'm right, and you
disagree, you must be wrong."
(>) --Sgt. Ingram (This was already on my page. Honest!)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.