From:	David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject:	Re: Melee Combat Revisited
Date:	Tue, 30 Dec 1997 06:33:09 -0700

DaveM wrote:
/
/ I had wrote an idea in a while back on Melee Combat but it didn't get
/ much response, since then I have talked to the group I run and we came
/ up with a better idea.
/
/ Keeping the same system and modifying it slightly we came up with this
/ regarding when a fast person fights with Armed/Unarmed against a slow
/ person the slow person shouldn't be able to react as well because he/she
/ goes way later, instead of not being able to defend at all or hit back
/ at all we decided that for every 10 segments in the combat round the
/ attacker is ahead of the defender the defender gets +2 to the TN# to
/ oppose the attacker, this reflects his being slower and slow to react to
/ the quick attacker and if he/she does hit back they deserve it with
/ those higher TN#'s. What yall think?
/
/ Oh, and I have been told on occasion about the Reply-to field thingy I
/ am doing is wrong, tell me if I fixed it this time, if I didn't tell me
/ how. Using Netscape 3.0, Win 3.1 (yeah its old).
/
/

-David
--
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes.
Art is knowing which ones to keep."
--
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm