Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Zixx <t_berghoff@*********.NETSURF.DE>
Subject: Re: Sniper rifles
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 19:40:09 +0000
On 17 Oct 97 at 4:47, George H Metz wrote:

[more infos on firearms]
> > The problem you run into is that a lot of people don't know that
> much
> >about firearms, and spending a lot of time an effort providing precise
> >stats and a lot of gory detail would not be of that much benefit to a
> >lot of people that play SR. Personally I think they are better off
> >sticking with the basic idea the way they have, and avoid trying to
> >burden the system with massive amounts of detail that really aren't that
> >necessary.
>
> Ahem. I am of the firm opinion that if you don't want combat detail, you
> should be playing White Wolf. =)

Yeah, SR is a pretty fighting-based game. And most PCs use guns for that.

>OTOH, you do have a point, insofar as
> the newbies who are mangling the system already don't need more rules to
> mangle. Therefore, the logical conclusion would be to include such arcane
> intricacies as the effect of muzzle flash on sniper concealment and the
> various methods of telling a gun to be quiet in an advanced rules section
> of the book, much like Rigger 2 did. Just a random thought.

Well, it only would be a couple of additional numbers. Calibre, tape of
siliencer/suppressor, etc.

> Oh, and BTW, I'm back. Hi. =)

Welcome back. Where have you been? (You disappeared just before we could
really start flaming about that matial-arts topic, George! :))


Tobias Berghoff a.k.a Zixx a.k.a. Charon, your friendly werepanther physad.

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------------
GAT/CS/S/IT d--- s+:- !a>? C++(++++)
UL++(++++) P+ L++ E W+ N+(+++) o? K?(-)
w---() O- M-- V- PS+ PE- Y+>++ PGP-
t+(++) 5+ X++ R* tv b++ DI(+) D++ G>++
e>+++++(*) h! r-- z?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK-------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.