Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: George H Metz <wolfstar@****.COM>
Subject: Re: SR3 Magic Terms)
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 03:29:06 -0500
On Tue, 30 Dec 1997 03:35:43 -0800 Matb <mbreton@**.NETCOM.COM> writes:
>Ereskanti wrote:
>
>> > wards that you're not the type of thing they're set to stop,
convincing
>> > spirits using Search power that you're not what you are... This
ability
>> > makes a whole lot of magic useless when used against such a
character.
>
>>Yes,but you are also NOT considering the reverse of the effects.
Redesigning
>>wards to be smarter, connecting their energies in association with
spiritual
>>or elemental energies, interlacing them with spells directly. Or even,
gasp
>>at this one, connecting the ward to a magician's own mind giving it a
chance
>>to notice things in much the same way that a Rigger now uses CCSS to
monitor
>>a site.
>
>This is an example of, ah, not thinking things out, Keith. Given that a
>"cloaked" Magician -- one using Masking to turn his aura into a potted
>plant -- is 'invisible' to the mage, hooking that mage up to a ward
>(which similarly won't pick up on the cloaked mage) affects nothing.

I dunno about this one. If I was rigging a site's wards, so to speak,
and I saw a potted plant waddling it's way towards me, I THINK I'd get a
little bit suspicious, and quite possibly nuke the thing, while hoping
it's not Bob playing a practical joke.

>Oh, it's still a nifty idea, just not in this particular example.

Yeah, tell me about it. =)

--
Wolfstar - wolfstar@****.com - Home Page Under Construction!

Some people simply are a waste of space on the buttocks of humanity.
-- Avenger

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1
GAT/! d- s+:+ a-- C++(++++)>$ U+ P? L>++ E? W++(--) N- o? K- w(--) O>+ M
!V PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP t+ 5+++ X R++ tv+ b+(+++) DI++ D--- G e h!-- r*
y+/-(--)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.