Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: AirWisp <AirWisp@***.COM>
Subject: Re: An Opposing View (Re: SR3 Magic Terms)
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 06:47:48 EST
In a message dated 97-12-31 02:35:26 EST, you write:

> Wow, do I get to say it now? There are no immortal elves in my games.
> Dunkelzahn is not a political figure in my games. They don't fit with the
> flavor. Powerful magic like teleportation, no (dissolving and reassembling
> a living being? Ouch, the drain, IMO). I've read some ED stuff, and
> played it, GMed it briefly. That doesn't mean I'll let it color my SR game
> world just yet. That's where I'm coming from.
>
> What works in one campaign will not necessarily work in most. Is your
> campaign typical?

No, most of you would consider our games munchkinish ... that what a lot of
the player's that have left and come back several times over have always
complained about ... and the only reason they keep coming bakc is that the
games are good anyway ... the villains are interesting ... and pc development
is highly stressed ... and we try to make to plotlines on an epic scale if at
all possible ...

Anyway, let's just try and have fun at this .. no need to chew a piece of my
really big behind ... though I don't mind the fact that it is a little smaller
thanks to your nibbling ... ;)

Mike

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.