From: | Joshua Bell <joshbell@**********.COM> |
---|---|
Subject: | None |
Date: | Fri, 1 May 1998 00:40:12 -0400 |
>>serious means. (i.e. not any "airport" scanner but maybe a High level
>>government scanner
*** Well, I don't think they'd be undetectable. After all, you can still
see
***the datajack, and someone with wired is going to be moving too quickly for
***normal people.
I simply say that extra money went to "cosmetics" (i.e. the datajack is
behind an ear covered with a flap of skin...etc).. and yes you are right
they ARE detectable when being USED.