Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: [OT] Mailer compatibility
Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 11:41:05 +0100
Jonathan Hurley said on 11:07/30 Apr 98...

> Oddly enough, both of those showed up as a yen sign in my mailer (MS-Ex
> Client v4 using courier new font) and can be entered as either
> alt-combo.

Same here, I noticed when I typed them in. (In Pegasus for Windows using
MS Sans Serif.)

> I don't know what this means, save that windows has some bizzare
> backwards-compatibility stuff.

It actually makes sense, somewhat -- if you put a 0 before the character
number, it gives a TrueType character, while without the 0, Windows must
somehow do a quick DOS -> TTF conversion and give the right character
anyway.

> (I'd be curious how Gurth's comes out - after being reprocessed by my
> mailer - in a mailreader that sees a difference between char 0165 and
> char 157).

I think 0165 would show up either as a weird code or as another character
entirely. You could save the message, go to a DOS prompt, and do a Type on
it. Hmm... I'll try that, see what comes out... Weird. Both the 0165 and
the 157 ended up as a capital N with that little Spanish wave above them.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
You're gonna like it, but not a lot.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.