Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Stephen Delear <c715591@******.MISSOURI.EDU>
Subject: Re: Eurowars
Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 18:31:17 -0500
At 04:19 PM 98-05-01 -0400, you wrote:
>At 01:51 PM 5/1/98 -0500, SteveD wrote:
>> Basically yes you can hide a carrier but the Nightwraiths WERE NOT CARRIER
>>LAUNCHED. Carrier landings screw up the avionics is stealth aircraft
>>that's why none of the present ones have tailhooks. Of course it's quite
>>common for present day stealth aircraft to be launched from afar and
>>refulled in mid flight.
>
>Actually, stealth aircraft don't have problems with their avionics being
>screwed up by carrier landings. One of the reasons that they don't have a
>tailhook is that there's not much room inside them for the equipment, since
>everything is internal.
>
>But the big reason they don't do carriers is the paint. All of that cool
>RAM and paint they use to bounce radar reacts BADLY to sea air. All of the
>salt content and stuff corrodes after a few weeks. Same thing happened to
>the Navy's newest F18 (E/F?). The paint all caused it to corrode. But I
>think that they just fixed it with the newest batch 6 months ago (it was
>about 2 years ago that I went to McDonnel Douglas and checked out their
>plant). They will be using the new type on the F22, which isn't quite as
>stealthy as the F177, but pretty close.

F22? I was under the impression that it was a classified aircraft. Then
again I could be thinking of a different aircraft.

SteveD
>
>Sommers
>
Stephen Delear
University of Missouri-Columbia
Check out my Photo Message Board at http://www.missouri.edu/~c715591
"Sometimes I do get to places just when God's ready to have somebody click
the shutter" Ansel Adams

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.