Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Wordman <wordman@*******.COM>
Subject: Corps care about money, not people (was Re: [OT] Euro question)
Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 19:07:23 -0400
While making a point almost unrelated to the one I'm now making, James
Ojaste listed some possible strategies for corps dealing with an
encroaching freeware operating system being released, writing:

> Mega #1 ties things up
> legally while Mega #2 writes virii to combat the OS directly, while
> Mega #3 kills the author(s) to discourage further development.

Mega #4 hires the writers to build the product for them (or keep it
perpetually unreleased and eventually move the writers into something
else). Mega #4 would probably win, unless the writers were _extremely_
idealistic. Mega #4 could rationalize spending a pretty large sum of cash.
Say they do $200 million in OS sales a year. If they think the new OS might
steal, say, 10% of the market from them, they are more than justified in
spending $20 million to buy out the writers. Probably more, because
controlling new OS could damage their sales year after year. I can't think
of many programmers who wouln't sell out for $20 million, especially if
they could keep working on their pet project. (Also, chances are a
mega-corp does way more than $200 million in OS sales.)

Mega #3, who went for killing the authors, wouldn't last long. Talent and
training are very hard to find; you don't get ahead by wasting people who
demonstrate both. Save murder as a way of solving problems for people who
care about honor and vengence and so on, like the Mob. Corps care about
money, not people. Sometimes, its smart for a corp to kill, but usually
cash will solve the problem with a lot less fuss.

Wordman

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.