Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Zixx <t_berghoff@*********.NETSURF.DE>
Subject: Re: Sex and the single shadowrunner?
Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 22:32:05 +0000
On 29 Apr 98 at 15:18, Ojaste,James [NCR] wrote:
(Oh boy, I'm really late with this. But *I* don't want to write all those
tests!)

> >Jett, don't tell me you need a book to incorporate sex in your game!?! ;)
> >Just for the f...erm...hell of it: When we are in the mood, we do combined
> >body/quickness-tests.
>
> Heh - I guess I'd better come clean...er...better make that "admit
> that I've written up rules for sex before". The basic premise was
> a special skill roll (TN 2, defaulting by one dot to Charisma) dealing
> stun damage resisted with Willpower... :-)

ROTFLW!!!
Heck, you know you kinda messed up the samurai's way of living? AFAIK they
used to have sexual intercourse (if that's the word...) before a fight. Now
if it was a really really good f-word, bye your system, they's enter the
fight with a serious stun. Not good don't you thing?

Besides, what's the damage-code based on? Partner's sex-skill (or half
charisma) as powerlevel (modified by a personal...uhm...hornity factor!?)
and a staging of L when charisma is 1 or 2, M when it's 3 or 4, S for 5 and
6 and D for everything above it.
Does that mean Barbie could kill with sex?!

:>


Tobias Berghoff a.k.a Zixx
ICQ: 9293066

A society without religion is like a crazed psychopath without a loaded .45

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------------
GAT/CS/S/IT d--- s+:-- !a>? C++(++++)
UL++(++++) P+ L++ E W+ N+ w---() O-
M-- PS+(+++) PE- Y+>++ t+(++) 5+ X++
R* tv b++ DI(+) D++ G>++ e>+++++(*)
h! r--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK-------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.