Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Danyel N Woods <9604801@********.AC.NZ>
Subject: Re: Feeling old [was: Re: DNA/DOA]
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 12:04:37 +1200
Quoth Paul Gettle (730 06-05-98 NZT):

>>Wasn't there a book of them? I don't remember the name now... We
>used to
>>have a copy of it somewhere... something like "Sprawl Sites". Seemed
>more
>>like "random adventures" than random encounters, but it had a long
>series
>>of tables.
>
>This, of all things, makes me feel a lot older than the whole 'I was
>in 5th grade during the Gulf War' thread.
>
>I've been generally laughing at the absurdity of the Sprawl Sites book
>since... oh, since when the outfit the decker archtype wears was
>actually in style.
>
>Only the last 20 pages of it were even worth the paper it was printed
>on.

Aw, c'mon, it's not that bad. Okay, so some of the encounters are a
little silly (PCs getting randomly strafed by a pair of Fire elementals?
Yeesh), but the building archetypes are exceedingly useful (especially
for someone who's short of time and/or a little lazy, like Yours Truly).
I agree with you about the contacts and archetypes (though in my copy
they need SR-II updating, and a little common sense - how the heck does
a Street Kid get hold of body-armour like an armoured vest?). And,
*with some work*, some of the encounters *are* useable as such, or short
adventures.

Of course, I may be biased by the fact that Sprawl Sites was the first
SR book I ever bought (after being given a rather tattered BBB gratis).

Sideline: in the SRII GM Screen, there's a bunch of cardboard character
'markers'. Most of them I can figure out, but who are the guys with the
chain-maces and the red-and-white armour? Red Samurai?

Danyel Woods
9604801@********.ac.nz
'Are you deliberately trying to drive me insane?'
'The universe is already mad. Anything else would be
redundant.'

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.