Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Sheldon Rose <scrose@****.COM>
Subject: (OT) Kindred in the shadows
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 10:18:02 -0500
Herbert Wolverson wrote:

>
> I personally think its a great shame that FASA seems to be de-emphasizing
> the Enemy. Deemphasizing the immortal elves would also be a mistake, IMV,
> but I don't see them going that far. I have run (and written) a great many
> games that have involved these two elements (as well as many that haven't),
> and I think they both add to the tapestry that is the Shadowrun setting....
> remove the components, and the colour fades. Now, I must confess to finding
> any game with more than a few minutes combat utterly boring (one thing SR
> gets right is quick, lethal combat), so gun-heavy type games never get
> my vote. If politics is the main focus, a bit of magic and the intrigue
> added by such things as immortal elves, always helps.
>
> Although I do risk creating a World of Darkness type Shadowrun. :-)

Glad I'm not the only one who runs this risk... :) Then again I've seen
folks go to the other extream where they are running the risk of having
a CP2020 type shadowrun :) Which is also one of the strengths of the
system and why it is so popular... I ran magic heavy game and campaign.
We had a good time with the bugs and horrors and nasty major mojo. While
a friend of mine was running the cyber and techno warfare campaign. The
neat thing was it was about 60% the same players where in both games.
Each game every other weekend and we always had fun no matter which way
we played the game...

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.