Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Airwasp <Airwasp@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Surgeons as Riggers?
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 11:35:40 EDT
In a message dated 5/5/98 5:41:58 PM !!!First Boot!!!, erikj@****.COM writes:

> Rigged surgery makes a lot of sense for SR.
>
> I don't know about remote surgery; that would enable too many nasty
> possibilities like rival riggers "hacking" in and taking over the surgery.

Ooooh, but it makes for one fragging good game ... an SR version of
Innerspace.

> But if the surgeon was physically there, rigged into a surgery drone or
> something, that would likely allow cleaner and quicker surgery.

The rigger-surgeon would probably be in the same room.

One good reason for surgery of this type is that the patient could be laid in
a tank filled with nanites and other stuff. This could then be sealed off,
allowing hospitals to no longer need truly "Clean" operating rooms.

> Just think; a robot doesn't have shaky hands. A robot can always cut as
> straight as is commanded. And a well trained rigger-surgeon could probably
> handle more than just two hands at a time; he could be controlling multiple
> robotic hands and utensils.

Umm, shaky hands in this case is when the rigger-surgeon screws up royally.
And then there is something called a Rig Deck.

> I would, however, require that more than a simple vehicle control rig be
> needed. A building needs a special interface to be controlled by a rigger.
> A surgery drone (or whatever you want to call it) would probably also
> function on some special protocols that would enable maximum utility of the
> system.

I don't see why a special VCR needs to be designed and constructed, as the
corps would want to use what is out there already (no need to go out and
redesign the wheel again).

> I would also think that this sort of surgery would be reserved for
> extremely delicate work, like brain surgery, or perhaps things like surgery
> to correct birth defects in a child while it is still in the womb.
> Probably a fair amount of cyberware implantation, especially those with
> complex neural connections, would or could fall into this style of surgery
> also.

This surgery would not be reserved for special tasks as anything that could
possibly fatten up the bottom line is definitely worth looking into.

> My thoughts on the matter anyway.

Nice thoughts, btw.

Mike

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.