Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Encounters
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 12:38:16 +0100
Cobra said on 2:02/ 7 May 98...

> >And we need to keep it simple -- Sprawl Sites has half-adventures, not
> >encounters. Hmm... is this an idea for the next PW book?
>
> It's not that simple. If it's only encounters, it can turn into random
> monsters... If this can arise, I think it could be interesting to give
> simple plots which can become bigger or keep small. A good exemple could
> be like this :
[snip example]

I like this... It allows for very simple encounters where all the runners
have to do is solve a small problem (or even do nothing at all and wait
until it goes away), or can get deeply involved if they choose to.

Should we write this up into a full net.book?


MC23 said on 22:04/ 6 May 98...

> I think we've found a good example of how some of these things should be
> set up. A window dressing option should be presented as well. Sometimes
> is nice to have background that has no plot attatched.

Another good idea.

> Gurth, are you ready to be editor to a net book with a general list
> contibution. Hell, I might even add something.

Sure, I've done it before and I'll probably do it again. However, there is
the minor matter that these things usually get bogged down for lots of
reasons and thus take very long to get finished :/

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
You're gonna like it, but not a lot.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.