Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Jeremy \"Bolthy\" Zimmerman" <jeremy@***********.COM>
Subject: Re: Non-running sources of income (was Re: Talismongering)
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 10:28:40 -0700
----------
> From: Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>
> To: SHADOWRN@********.ITRIBE.NET
> Subject: Re: Non-running sources of income (was Re: Talismongering)
> Date: Thursday, May 07, 1998 9:18 AM
>
> In a message dated 5/7/98 9:58:09 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
> michael.cugley@******.NET writes:
>
> > On the subject of security for one's enchanting adept's thriving
Orichalcum
> > production facitlity, what do you think High Lifestyle's for, anyway?
> > Security is included in the price, as I recall...
> >
> >
> That is correct, High Lifestyle does have -some- security...but is it the
kind
> of security that is more readily capable of handling a group that is out
to
> steal something that only a magician is likely to want that badly???
>

I have two words to go along with that:

Gang background.

One of the few mages I ever ran I got the gang background, and my GM let me
populate it with the "wiz kid mage" contact... the ones with a magic
attribute of three. It was one of those, "You're hired to protect X, but
no matter what you do, X dies." Adventures. It was a published one, so
someone on here has probably been on the same adventure.

Anyway, the gang was really handy. Helping out with ritual sendings of a
special spell I called "rotting curse" (I had a whole Cthulhu mythos going
with this guy), keeping an eye on stuff for a few hundred nuyen. If you
had luxury lifestyle and let them stay with you when they weren't keeping
watch for you, you'd have a pretty handy magical security force.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.