Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jessica Grota <grota@*********.COM>
Subject: Skateboard mishaps (wuz: rollerblades)
Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 21:36:25 -0400
Sheldon Rose wrote:
>
> Jonathan Andrews wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 8 May 1998, Fade wrote:
> >
> > > Double 'uneven ground' penalty, just 'attacker walking' instead of
> > > running (still target running) and quickness*4 speed, throwing in
> > > crash tests once in a while (using athletics).. does that sound about
> > > right?
> > >
> >
> > If they're good enough to be fighting on rollerblades, give them an
> > athletics (rollerblades:combat) specialization. Just watch out for that
> > recoil!
>
> ROFL :) That was funny but on a more serious note about this I have
> rather extensive rules for skates, Not just Blades but also Quads (the
> ones with one wheel at each corner) skateboards, and bicycles both
> mountain bikes and road bikes... Skill is the biggest factor if someone
> knows how to skate or ride well it can and will negate many of negitives
> stated above... Matter of fact I worked out my rules after exchanging
> some ideas with some of the list members...

I just HAD to say something about skateboards and PC stupidity, since I
have a great story about it. I recall a game where one PC attempted to
stand on his skateboard and hold onto a rope that was tied to the back
of my char's Yamaha Rapier. The GM said okay, you can try it. Of course,
it was with a smirk. Since my char was doing about 70mph, (Yes, it was
Jett, again. Just let me know when you're sick of hearing about her
antics! :)), the skateboarding shadowrunner wannabe lost his balance
when the Jettster took a corner, and slammed into a lightpost. I think
it's one of the best laughs I've ever had in the "He was asking for it"
department. He wasn't killed, but I think he wound up in traction for
QUITE a while. :>

--Jett

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.