From: | Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SR1 vs. SR2 |
Date: | Mon, 11 May 1998 14:05:03 +0100 |
|
|Jonathan Andrews said on 14:41/10 May 98...
|
|> Whoa waitaminute. How did explosives work in SRI?
|
|Explosive ammo for firearms, you mean? They added 2 to the weapon's
|Staging, making the damage a lot harder to get rid of. In SRII the ammo
|was severely weakened, IMHO.
I think he was asking how *explosives* work.
Grenades, C12, etc....
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
|Principal Subjects in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
|Comp Sci & Electronics | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |