Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Lehlan Decker <decker@****.FSU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Odd Rigging Situation....
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 10:32:53 -0500
>
> In a message dated 5/8/98 9:06:42 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
> decker@****.FSU.EDU writes:
>
> > The spirit had a strength of 10, so I had a power
> > level of five, ended up doing serious damage to the drone, and moderate
> > to the players. But this was arbitrary if anything.
> > Anyone pulled this one? I was thinking the collision rules would work,
> > if I figured out how fast I could throw a drone. :)
> > Anyway..one PC ended up dead, the rest made it out, and have a new
> > respect for bugs. :)
> > (And I didn't get home until 2AM, so if this is incoherent, please
> > ignore me :))
> >
> How about if we reverse engineer the "ramming" rules? In those, you divide
> the current speed rate by 10, which gives the "Ramming Power" of the
attack.
> In this case, the drone simply has the bugs strength (the 10 if I am following
> right). The "damage level" varies on the effective speed. A speed of
"100"
> (10 strength x 10 ramming modifier), which comes up with a Serious Wound
> category (did I get that right??? no books are handy).
>
> Hows' that for a thought?
>
I'm looking into that as well. Actually I'll probably write down several
ideas and the results and let my players pick which will become the
"permanent" ruling. :)
My problem is I wasn't sure how much speed a Strength of 10 could
impart. (How fast can he throw a baseball??). I forget the drones
weight...hmm...I'll double check tonight.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Lehlan Decker 644-4534 Systems Development
decker@****.fsu.edu http://www.scri.fsu.edu/~decker
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The universe doesn't have laws, it has habits. And habits can be broken.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.