Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Rune Fostervoll <runefo@***.UIO.NO>
Subject: Re: SR1 vs. SR2
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 17:16:55 GMT
> My view of Karma is more amoral than than. Regular karma awards are already
> under great interpretation, all we need now is another one to be abused.
> I've never realized how generous other games are with Karma. I still say
> mine maintains more control even if it is way below this lists average.

In my campaign Karma is 100% amoral. Otherwise, I run it by the book.
Players generall burn enough karma they'll never have pools of more than 3-4
karma. Amassing huge karma pools isn't really a problem unless you let it grow
into one. The players *was* extremely attached to their karma... took deadly
wounds instead of burning a point or two to dodge or get 'just' serious.
That has changed, which is good, IMO.

--

ADVICE, n. The smallest current coin.
-Ambrose Bierce

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.