From:	Katt Freyson <katt@******.NET>
Subject:	Re: Do you all jump to conclusions, or is it just for me? (long)
Date:	Mon, 11 May 1998 13:58:01 -0400

|> From: Alfredo B Alves
|> Sent: May 11, 1998 3:46 AM
|> Subject: Re: Do you all jump to conclusions, or is it just for me?

|> Are you *seriously* saying that a peice of cyberware that hurls chunks of
|> the user's own flesh at an opponent is a valid SR concept? (btw pleas
|> read this all the way to the end :)

While you and most of the sane world may agree that this is stupid and
won't work, this does _not_ mean it is an invalid concept. Within the
framework of the SR universe it was well thought out. Most of us, it would
seem, don't agree that it would work, but that is something else.


|> Shapeshifters are not munchy; players are munhy; players who try to get
|> maximum result for minimum drawbacks are munchy.

That's _your_ opinion, not a fact. I'd say that this was reasonable and
sane, however, reasonable and sane is not fun.

|> I admit it was rough on you but that was intentional, I wanted to make
|> sure you knew how serious that was

Er, take it easy there big fella. It would seem that _you_ are the one
with the problem here, heck even Loche 7 had no problem. Desmothes did
nothing wrong here, you are the one who is brining evil into this. You
claimed to know his intent, my question is how? Are you sure you are not
projecting? The French have a good saying for this, "Mal est lui, qui mal y
trouve." Roughly translated, "Evil is he who finds evil here."

Also, your vile responses to him indicates that you may have a problem
that needs to be looked at. Desmothes wanted to talk about his idea, never
did he say, or imply that his G.M. was an idiot and that he wanted our aid
in convincing him. So please, stop with this BS.

|> By ranged combat I believe whoever stated that was refering to mundane
|> ranged combat...

Correct, but I guess I could have been clearer.

Katt Freyson
ICQ UIN 3337155
Montreal, Canada
http://www.dsuper.net/~katt