From:	MC23 <mc23@**********.COM>
Subject:	Re: A dissertation on the Flesh Chukker (LONG)
Date:	Tue, 12 May 1998 02:10:15 -0400

Once upon a time, Phil Levis wrote;

>Admittedly, I haven't been following this thread too closely. However, the
>conclusions that are being made to justify why this veritable weapon of
>destruction wouldn't work are, in my eyes, quite hacked and erroneous.
>
>First of all, chunks of flesh torn from someone certainly do have some
>sort of astral connection to that person; otherwise, said flesh wouldn't
>help with ritual magic, which it does.

<snip the rest>

A photograph works for ritual magic. It's a weaker connection but it
can be used and it is not considered live in the slightest.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23