Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Tim Kerby <drekhead@***.NET>
Subject: Re: A dissertation on the Flesh Chukker (LONG)
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 09:29:09 -0500
On 12 May 98 at 2:10, MC23 wrote:

> Once upon a time, Phil Levis wrote;
>
> >First of all, chunks of flesh torn from someone certainly do have some
> >sort of astral connection to that person; otherwise, said flesh wouldn't
> >help with ritual magic, which it does.
>
> A photograph works for ritual magic. It's a weaker connection but it
> can be used and it is not considered live in the slightest.
>

Exactly. I think DNA samples work, not because they contain a living
aura, but because of the sympathetic nature of auras. The DNA is
imprinted the same way an area of space can be imprinted. That is why
a photograph can work. It is imprinted as well. I don't have my books
with me, but that is the way I remember things.

--

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.