Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: A dissertation on the Flesh Chukker (LONG)
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 16:03:34 +0100
And verily, did Phil Levis hastily scribble thusly...
|First of all, chunks of flesh torn from someone certainly do have some
|sort of astral connection to that person; otherwise, said flesh wouldn't
|help with ritual magic, which it does.

But the same could be said for a pen that the target owned and loved for a
long peroid of time.

Neither as astrally active, and that is the crux of the argument EVERYONE is
trying to get through.

|Sure, you can tear chunks of flesh from a person. Sure, you can accelerate
|these chunks to pretty high velocities. The question is, will they hurt
|something in astral space? I'd argue no.

I concur. As do a lot of others.

|It has been suggested that an astral form can be 'destroyed' by crushing
|it between two astrally active objects. (Corporate Security Handbook)
|However, this is because the astral form has no place to escape to. If the
|astral form can escape, it is merely 'pushed' away from the physical
|object. The example given is of an astrally active net being dropped where
|a mage is astrally projecting; they'll either pass through the floor, or
|if the floor is astrally active (let's say it's completely covered with a
|magical mold), something really painful happens, and the mage dies. Or so
|some wage mage says... FASA has never stated in rules what happens.

I think you should look back in the logs, specifically looking for Mike
Mulvihill and the FAT debate.


|I'd argue that a piece of flesh, accelerated to high velocity, would not
|harm an astral entity. Instead, it would move it out of its way, in an
|extremely violent fashion; if it were a (meta)human projecting, they would
|be severly disoriented.

Considering the fact that a mage is capable of 0-1000mph in 1 second, I
don't think the disorientation would be all that bad.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
|Principal Subjects in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
|Comp Sci & Electronics | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.