From: | David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Cyberware and Regeneration |
Date: | Tue, 12 May 1998 11:22:00 -0600 |
/
/ >In the case of a shapeshifter shifting from one form to another I
/ >believe that cyberware would be rejected because it's unaffected by
/ >the ability that allows a shifter to shift shape. So when a shifter
/ >shifts shape (say that three times fast ;) the configuration of the
/ >cyberware doesn't change. It's like having a square peg in a square
/ >hole and turning the square hole into a round hole. When the shifter
/ >shifts shape the cyberware is "static" and causes damage as the flesh
/ >that surrounds it changes position. Since the cyberware is no longer
/ >where it's supposed to be, it's treated as a foreign object and is
/ >rejected as the shifter regenerates the damage.
/ >
/ >Just my two cents.
/
/ I like that, except that the disparity between shapechange spell and
/ shapeshifting isn't addressed. I guess if you just say they work
/ differently, this becomes a good conclusion, but not necessarily the only one.
Definitely not the only one, just one among many :)
-DB
--
"This above all: to thine own self be true..."
- Shakespeare
--
email: dbuehrer@******.carl.org
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm