Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject: Re: Do you all jump to conclusions, or is it just for me? (long)
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 11:29:52 -0600
Katt Freyson wrote:
/
/ |> From: MC23 Sent: May 12, 1998 2:32 AM
/ |> Subject: Re: Do you all jump to conclusions, or is it just for me?
/
/ |> >Perhaps people are playing with rules for the sake of an
/ |> interesting idea, and you have NO BUSINESS JUDGING THEM because of it.
/ |>
/ |> It was presented to the list to be judged.
/
/ Well, the problem is that some people didn't limit themselves to
/ judging the idea, they went on to judge the person who proposed it, and his
/ motives. Some even went so far as to tell us what his intent was. This was
/ unacceptable in a free discussion list. While his idea might have been gross
/ and ultimately stupid, those who jumped on him for proposing it were worse.

"Hey, do you smell smoke?"

<GridSec>

I'll admit that I haven't been following this thread to closely, but
this post caught my attention.

Ladies and Gentlemen, this is starting to look like the beginnings of
a brush fire that could lead to an all out flame war. If I'm
mistaken, I apologize for the intrusion.

If I'm not mistaken please, try to remain calm and rational. If you
gotta flame on, do so off the list.

This has been a friendly notice from your local neighborhood GridSec
Enforcer.

Thank you for your time.

</GridSec>

-D
--
"This above all: to thine own self be true..."
- Shakespeare
--
email: dbuehrer@******.carl.org
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.