From: | David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Do you all jump to conclusions, or is it just for me? (long) |
Date: | Tue, 12 May 1998 11:29:52 -0600 |
/
/ |> From: MC23 Sent: May 12, 1998 2:32 AM
/ |> Subject: Re: Do you all jump to conclusions, or is it just for me?
/
/ |> >Perhaps people are playing with rules for the sake of an
/ |> interesting idea, and you have NO BUSINESS JUDGING THEM because of it.
/ |>
/ |> It was presented to the list to be judged.
/
/ Well, the problem is that some people didn't limit themselves to
/ judging the idea, they went on to judge the person who proposed it, and his
/ motives. Some even went so far as to tell us what his intent was. This was
/ unacceptable in a free discussion list. While his idea might have been gross
/ and ultimately stupid, those who jumped on him for proposing it were worse.
"Hey, do you smell smoke?"
<GridSec>
I'll admit that I haven't been following this thread to closely, but
this post caught my attention.
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is starting to look like the beginnings of
a brush fire that could lead to an all out flame war. If I'm
mistaken, I apologize for the intrusion.
If I'm not mistaken please, try to remain calm and rational. If you
gotta flame on, do so off the list.
This has been a friendly notice from your local neighborhood GridSec
Enforcer.
Thank you for your time.
</GridSec>
-D
--
"This above all: to thine own self be true..."
- Shakespeare
--
email: dbuehrer@******.carl.org
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm