Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Alfredo B Alves <dghost@****.COM>
Subject: Re: RM Tarot Mage in SR
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 20:14:50 -0500
On Tue, 12 May 1998 15:45:12 -0800 Max Rible <slothman@*********.ORG>
writes:
>At 17:58 5/12/98 -0500, Alfredo B Alves insinuated:
>>OK, I to port RM's Tarot Mage into SR (MC 23: :P~ ) so here's my first
>>attempt:
>
>>First a Tarot Mage must have enchanting skill and must create the
>>following items (fetishes):
>>A Sword (which can also be a Weapon Focus, and/or Spell Focus)
>>A Cup (which can also a Spell Focus)
>>A Rod (which can also a Power focus, and/or Spell Focus
>>A Pentacle (which can also a Spell Focus)
>>A Tarot Deck (which can also a Spell focus/Spirit Focus)
>
>Actually, using the Tarot as part of a magical style is *very*
appropriate
>to Hermetic magic. Try sitting down and thinking about how a Tarot mage
>would go about working their magic, then create a Hermetic mage with
>appropriate fetishes. FASA has left most of Hermetic magic completely
>undefined, other than the circle used for conjuring, so there's lots of
>room for making yourself a mage with a distinctive but thoroughly
Hermetic
>style. Assign the four suits of the Tarot to the usual four elements
and
>the corresponding spell categories, keep the Major Arcana for health
spells
>and metaplanar stuff, and get more detailed from there...
>
>--
>%% Max Rible %% slothman@*****.com %%
<SNIP Sig>

Hmmm.... why make the Major Arcana Health? and what about the Minor
Arcana? How would you reccommend matching suits with elements / spell
categories? Also, I was thinking of requiring that Tarot Mages have Hard
Copy Libraries ... do you think that makes sense or should I just leave
it be?

D.Ghost
(aka Pixel, Tantrum)

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.