From:	Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject:	Re: Motion
Date:	Wed, 13 May 1998 03:12:50 +0100

And verily, did Matb hastily scribble thusly...
|
|David Thompson wrote:
|
|> >In other words, I vote against your motion. The FAQ doesn't need anything
|> >like that added to it.
|
|> A vote against common courtesy and decency. Logged as such.
|
|No: a vote against unnecessary rules. David -- this *really* struck me
|as a provocation.

Asking for a vote about banning personal attacks and then personally
attacking the first person to vote no...

Shows what a jackass and hypocrit this person can be....
(Don't worry, it's only personal)...

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
|Principal Subjects in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
|Comp Sci & Electronics | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |