From:	Fade <runefo@***.UIO.NO>
Subject:	Re: Cyberware and Regeneration
Date:	Wed, 13 May 1998 05:28:42 +0000

Robert Watkins wrote:
> >Actually, it could be done. You'd just have to keep slicing and dicing
> >until the patient's regeneration failed.
>
> Or use a weapon that the 'patient' is allergic to... such wounds don't
> regenerate.

I saw this interpretation a few other places as well. It's not
entirely correct - it is regenerated slower, not not at all. (1 box
per minute), at least according to SR Companion.
(Is that book cause of a few arguments or what? :)

I snipped the rest because it basically assumed it didn't regenerate.

Now, if you ask me to quote it, I can't, but it was written a couple
of hundred posts ago in the chunk thread, IIRC. I also seem to recall
it might not be that way in the BBB, which would add to the
confusion.. and leave more room for things to go either way.
--
Fade

And the Prince of Lies said:
"To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven."
-John Milton, Paradise Lost