From:	Robert Watkins <robert.watkins@******.COM>
Subject:	Re: Cyberware and Regeneration
Date:	Wed, 13 May 1998 13:36:10 +1000

Fade writes:
>Robert Watkins wrote:
>> >Actually, it could be done. You'd just have to keep slicing and dicing
>> >until the patient's regeneration failed.
>>
>> Or use a weapon that the 'patient' is allergic to... such wounds don't
>> regenerate.

>I saw this interpretation a few other places as well. It's not
>entirely correct - it is regenerated slower, not not at all. (1 box
>per minute), at least according to SR Companion.
>(Is that book cause of a few arguments or what? :)


It was probably my interpretation. I don't have the SR Companion. And in the
BBB, it gives the ruling I used above.

OTH, if even wounds caused by allergies regenerate, then by the rest of the
reasoning I used, it would _not_ be possible to put cyber into a
regenerating PC (My post stated that would be the only way).

--
.sig deleted to conserve electrons. robert.watkins@******.com