Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Nexx <nexx@********.NET>
Subject: Re: RM Tarot Mage in SR
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 18:26:14 -0500
----------
> From: Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>

> > How do you know so much about "real" magic? I've always wondered
this,
> > because I doubt FASA pays you enough to simply "become" a magic
scholar.
> > Do you practice Wicca or something? (I doubt seriously I phrased
that
> > properly) You seem to have a knowledge about "real" magic traditions
above
> > and beyond that of most mere mortals.
> >
> I am going to answer this for Steve, but not directly. THIS TOPIC got
way out
> of hand as I recall a year or so ago. There are many beliefs running
around,
> that much is certain.

Ummm, K? As much as I dislike disagreeing with you, I think he was just
wondering where Steve was coming from, not trying to start any debates on
the reality behind magic. After all, if Steve is writing from a
fundamentalist Baptist viewpoint, we're going to have a much different
supplement than if he were a Thelemic magician, Druid, Native American
shaman, new-age crystal-waver, or professed skeptic. After all, take a
look at Palladium. In terms of real-world magical traditions, Kevin
Siembieda has, at best, an armchair magician's knowledge. He's not a
practitioner, doesn't believe in it, and actively discourages it in the
front of all his books. That leads to a substantially different magic
system than Shadowrun, which was (IIRC), partially conceived by a couple
of Thelemic magicians.

***************
Rev. Mark Hall, Bardagh
aka Pope Nexx Many-Scars, PML FAQ Cop
aka Ellegon
ICQ 8108180 AIM: Nexx3
How many Druids does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
Doesn't happen. Druids screw in stone circles, not lightbulbs.
--------[Geek Code Block]-----------
GED/GSS d- s++:+ a-- C++ W w+ PS+.5 PE- Y+ t+
5+ X+ R*+.5 !tv+ b+.5 DI+ D- G e h !r-- !y+
-------[End Geek Code Block]-------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.