From:	"Jeremy \"Bolthy\" Zimmerman" <jeremy@***********.COM>
Subject:	Re: Cyberware and Regeneration
Date:	Thu, 14 May 1998 08:41:55 -0700

----------
> From: Katt Freyson <katt@******.NET>
> To: SHADOWRN@********.ITRIBE.NET
> Subject: Re: Cyberware and Regeneration
> Date: Wednesday, May 13, 1998 8:09 PM
>
> |> From: Jeremy "Bolthy" Zimmerman
> |> Sent: May 13, 1998 12:39 PM
> |> Subject: Re: Cyberware and Regeneration
>
> |> "Beings recover (or regenerate) from wounds inflicted by the
> |> substances to
> |> which they are vulnerable at the same speed at which they recover from
> |> wounds caused by other sources."
>
> So, if my cognitive skills are okay and the quote accurate, one
would
> see that a vulnerability will cause one damage, but the damage heals a
per
> any normal wound, ergo, cutting someone with an object made of material
the
> subject is vulnerable to will actually not cause any problem for the
> subject, as long as said subject has the power Regenerate.
>

Pretty much. You have a higher chance of giving him a deadly wound, since
I believe vulnerability stages it up a level, and allergy increases the
power level, depending on the severity of the allergy. So if you were to
go up against Strahd von Sillygoose, I'd rather have Hans and Franz the
street sammies with wired reflexes 3 and their Panther Assault Cannons with
integral smart-gun links and maybe a mage stacking mana bolts than Dr. van
Helsings going at with a stake and a bottle of holy water. =)

"Say it with sabots."