Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Paul Gettle <pgettle@********.NET>
Subject: Re: Fiber Optics
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 12:46:55 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 09:19 AM 5/14/98 -0700, Bolty wrote:
>An idea that comes to mind is that rather than having a parallel line
for
>deckers, why not have nothing? It looks like a normal datapath, and
by
>performing an analyze operation you can tell that data you're looking
for
>had been transfered down there, but when you try to actually go
there,
>simsense just cuts out and a copy of your icon is shunted down the
line.
>You're still connected though, and can still act, but you are
effectively
>more than blind. No senses whatsoever. Call it a +16 for any
operations
>to represent that fact. Kinda like trying to use a stranger's
computer
>when the monitor and keyboard are broken, and all you can use is the
mouse.


This is aproximately how I run it. The big problem with that from the
decker's standpoint is the fact that you don't have any way of knowing
if you've run into IC on the other side of the one-way line. (although
if it's black IC, it can't affect your meatbody, since the lethal
simsense feedback has no way to get to you)

In the chapter about one-way datalines in NAGRL, there is a reference
to the decker being able to exit a node connected by a one-way
dataline. The only way I see to be able to do that would be to let the
decker make a new copy of the persona, further back up on the
datatrail, and delete the persona on the other side of the one-way
dataline.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3

iQCVAwUBNVsf8s2C0fERRVM5AQEg2wP+Mhj6Hh03aQFs1zFUTdjVWTCb27b7NJxY
ERmOTCzy7DlW3LbjWLc/z3KgtDPYA/dx90fAca3GFga5b+HKNPQWJ9WZ6kXW34ah
vtsR7PvCJzD9+Sv8WYdI697IxLhz0EMpHpAbVemCecUN3vpCFLS+Fu4OGLMdLcH6
8eIe5s1LPAY=
ïX7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
-- Paul Gettle (pgettle@********.net)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:11455339 (RSA 1024, created 97/08/08)
625A FFF0 76DC A077 D21C 556B BB58 00AA

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.