Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Alfredo B Alves <dghost@****.COM>
Subject: Illusion vrs Magic (Re: Freakdom)
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 12:34:11 -0500
On Thu, 14 May 1998 12:29:05 -0400 MC23 <mc23@**********.COM> writes:
>Once upon a time, Lehlan Decker wrote;
>>Hmm...wait I can bring this back to shadowrun.....I wonder if present
day
>>style illusionist and magicians would still be around, or would they
have
>>been totally replaced by the "real" thing.

> There could be a revived respect for the mundanes. A lot of people
>go to those show so they can try to see through the trick. With Magic,
>you can't do that. "Oh, he just turned it invisible. Big deal." Real
>Magicians might even find it enjoyable. I could even imagine real
>Magicians debunking stage magicians for using magic. How's that for a
180
>degree turn for you.
> I feel there's an adventure in this somewhere. I might have an
>encounter for you book so Gurth.
>
<SNIP Sig>
> I am MC23

Why not Real Magicians as Stage Magicians? Either hiding they are real
magicians or applying stage magic towards real magic ... why take that
heavy drain from casting that spell that does what you want to do when
you can combine mundane resources with magic so much more effectively?
Can you imagine Houdini as a real magician? He'd flay you alive not so
much from powerful spells but from using spells effectively ... like a
surgeon and his scalpel ... :)

D.Ghost
(aka Pixel, Tantrum)
"That focus? Uhm, It's just a prop ... I'm a very thurough Stage
Magician ..."

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.