From:	Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject:	Re: MY Take (Binder's Look on Enchanting)
Date:	Fri, 15 May 1998 09:50:00 EDT

In a message dated 5/15/98 5:01:25 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
evamarie@**********.net writes:

> Which makes them (Enchanters) a good value holding investment for a
mundane, maybe,
>
> but still about as useful to him as a 2 handled spoon.
> If its "loot", and I'm mundane, I'd still rather sell it before
some
> mage "buddy" of mine gets real attached to it, and decides it's more his
> than mine.
>
> -Mongoose X

Okay, I think I see a pattern here. This is part of that "game view" thing.
In MOST games, an Enchanter Adept is incredibly limiting, so they HAVE to do
something else in order to compensate. Hell, when I first made Reflex/Binder,
he was a Decker/Enchanter, and since he didn't have astral perception as per
the rules, he wasn't effected when decking the same as a full magician.

But, in any case, Mongoose has his opinions of Enchanter flexibility, and
other people have theirs....

-K