| From: | MC23 <mc23@**********.COM> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Locking distant spells |
| Date: | Fri, 15 May 1998 21:46:37 -0400 |
>> The Spell Lock would have to be on the Sammie. If the Spell Lock was
>> removed then the lock would be broken.
>
>I've always assume the same, but I don't recall anything that requires
>or even implies this. But I haven't re-read the section on spell locks
>recently, so I may have just forgotten.
You forgot. It's in the BBB.
>> Spell locks have to be attatched to the target.
>
>Is this a rule (from where?), an opinion, or something else?
BBB yet again. I state my opinions.
>
>> >P.P.S. Can you get a Panther Assault Cannon through a metal detector
>> >by enchanting it to be a Spell Lock and activating it?
>>
>> How does one wear a Panther Assualt Cannon? Spell locks have to be
>> worn.
>
>Come on, I expect better than that from you. :-) Most big weapons have
>straps of some sort so they can be worn rather than carried by hand.
>And why does the spell lock specifically have to be worn. I've always
>assumed they could be carried in hands, pockets, or whatever.
Carried in a pocket is the only reference ever made to it not being
worn. But if contact ever breaks then the spell is cancelled. Wearing the
spell lock reduces the risk of breaking that contact. It's a pain in the
ass to keep rebonding those puppies.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23
