Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: MC23 <mc23@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Locking distant spells
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 21:48:44 -0400
Once upon a time, Brian Moore wrote;

>So how do you handle spell locks that aren't placed on people? I think
>Lone Star or other groups have (area effect?) Preserve spell locks used
>to preserve ritual samples. There are lots of applications for Spell
>Locks that don't involve people. I would assume that a Spell Lock must
>be somewhat near the spell it is maintaining.

Yet again, the spell lock must be on the target of the spell. I
really suggest you reread the BBB where it goes into detail about spell
locks.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.