Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: MC23 <mc23@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Locking distant spells
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 21:51:34 -0400
Once upon a time, Jeremy "Bolthy" Zimmerman wrote;

>I think you've got it a little backwards. You cast the spell on the spell
>lock, and it locks the spell into it. You can then hang the spell lock on
>your dog, your sword, your uncle's monkey's goat, your Eurocar Westwind
>and, if you are a mage, can activate it. You can apparently put it on an
>inanimate object. Don't want it there? Turn it off and put it somewhere
>else. Stick it to 'em with stick ups! It just has to be in physical
>contact with the target. By the rules, mundanes cannot see it, touch it,
>or affect it.

You forgot, once the Spell Lock is activated it cannot be removed
from the target without breaking the spell. It would then need to be
rebonded. Having the Spell Lock deactivated does not get around this.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.