Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: T-Shirts
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 11:30:51 +0100
Erik Jameson said on 14:44/15 May 98...

> >Blasphemer! The Back Shalt Have The Listmembers Names On It...
>
> Honestly, why? I don't see any real reason to put our names on the shirt,
> especially when that space can be better used for some good artwork. I
> think it makes for a far more attractive shirt without the names.

I agree with Lady J., the shirt should have the names on the back of
everyone who buys a shirt. I don't buy that it'll be more attractive
without the names; all it needs is to be done right (unlike the 1996
shirt, which just had a very bland list of names and nothing else on the
back).

> Hmmm...
>
> Okay, here's a thought, but it would make the t-shirts cost more.
>
> The "ShadowRN: Pre-Awakened Forum" bit goes on the right sleeve of the
> t-shirt. The front has whatever artwork we decide on.

Woudln't it be easier (less expensive) to put both the "forum" text and
the artwork on the front?

> And on the back it says something like "1998 Council Members" or "Team
> 1998" or something like that with the names of the people listed below
> it.

That's the way the 1994 and 195 shirts were set up, more or less.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
Now it's my time.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.