Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: New use for Masking)
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 12:00:49 EDT
In a message dated 5/16/98 10:07:49 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
dghost@****.COM writes:

> The Astral Self is based on an idealized self image so what about a spell
> that for x amount of time changed what your self-image was? (VERY
> dangerous)

The only problem that -I- see with that is the a spell has problems with the
"duration" concept. In the games here, we re-adapted the "Anchoring
duration
table" in the grimoire" so as to function as a way for a spell to be "self-
sustaining" in a limited fashion. Basically, the spell would last for a
variable amount of time, as determined by the table in reference to the spell
design.

In the "Astral Changeling" spell concept I was bouncing around here, the
"Deep
Mind Interaction" modifiers were used as a way to sort of compensate for the
changes to the "Aura" itself, a way of measuring the drain for the spell
design at is were.

> Also through Intiation you can make slight changes to your spell
> signature so you might rule that through Intiation you can also make
> small changes to your Astral Self.

I don't know if this is Canon or not, but in the games here, we allow for an
Initiate to opt to change his/her astral signature on a "permanent" basis when
they advance in a grade. The cost is that the initiate does not gain the
benefits of the Grade towards his/her magical attribute.

From the POV of ritual casting made at the person, it would count as a "Poor
Link" Magical Edge IMO. If you did it in stages, then perhaps the benefits
could be cumulative. Kind of like the way a "Retrain Datatrail" throws off
search cycles in the Matrix. It's a strange comparison I know, but it's the
only -in game- comparison I could think of quickly.

-K

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.