From:	MC23 <mc23@**********.COM>
Subject:	Re: MY Take (Binder's Look on Enchanting)
Date:	Sat, 16 May 1998 16:21:38 -0400

Once upon a time, Ereskanti wrote;

>In a message dated 5/15/98 1:24:42 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
>mc23@**********.COM writes:
>
>> That's still the spell and casters responsibility. And what does a
>> spell have to do with enchanted items.
>>
>Because in SR, "spells" are the basis of "Anchorings/Quickenings/Spell
>Locks", which are "magical items."

Anchorings and Quickenings are not items in any sense. They are the
product of Sorcery not Enchanting. Spell Lock's worth only becomes
apparent when a spell is locked by them. Basicly put, a Spell Lock is
still not a stand alone "magic item." A lot of people still seem to be
under the misinterpretation of how that works.

>You know, the more and more I keep reading these responses lately, the more
>and more I really begin to think everyone doesn't relate to anyone else.

That's a pretty open ended statement to leave lying around like that.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23