Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Ally Spirit Damage
Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 11:39:46 +0100
SThanatos said on 20:10/17 May 98...

> I need to know how Ally spirits take damage when combating a mage.
> I assume spirit to spirit combat is resolved par usual, consisting of
> basically melee combat with force dice.

That's my idea too.

> But:
> Say, my force 4 ally spirit comes up against a mage with a sorcery skill of
> 5 who is astrally projecting. How is combat resolved?

As per the normal astral combat rules: in essence, melee combat using the
magician's Sorcery or Unarmed Combat skill and the spirit's Reaction
(because it's a critter), which equals its Force. See page 148 of SRII:
"Combat with magical creatures follows the general rules for the
environment, physical or astral, where the battle is taking place."

The magician would cause (Charisma)L damage, either Stun or Physical as
the character chooses, while the spirit does (Force)M, also Stun or
Physical as the spirit chooses (SRII p. 147).

> Does an ally spirit have a damage table like physical damage, or do they
> just lose force points?

I don't see why a spirit should not have a normal condition monitor like
everyone else. It's not mentioned anywhere I can remember that they don't,
so that must mean they do :)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
Professional cynic, but my heart's not in it.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.