From:	Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject:	Re: OT: screen-size. (was: Re: MY Take (Binder's Look on
Date:	Tue, 19 May 1998 12:10:50 +0100

And verily, did Robert Nesius hastily scribble thusly...
|ELM isn't fixed to 80x24. Your screen is. Elm can adust to fill in
|80x80 terminals, 80x40 terminals, or even 200x10 terminals. The restriction
|is your hardware, not ELM. :)

Oh, I knew that, but why on earth would I want to quit out of elm, resize
the window, and jump back in, just to see a badly formatted posting?

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
|Principal Subjects in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
|Comp Sci & Electronics | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |