Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Ojaste,James [NCR]" <James.Ojaste@**.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: Air Elemental Confinement
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 11:23:58 -0400
Ereskanti wrote:
>In a message dated 5/18/98 1:04:38 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
>robert.watkins@******.COM writes:
>
>> And for the munchkin who has everything (don't they all?), I present the
>>Gas
>> Barrier spell. Drain Target is increased by two over Bullet Barrier. The
>> barrier represents a normal Barrier spell, with the exception that the
>> Barrier is airtight. Anyone placed in it will eventually asphyxiate. If
>cast
>> on or around an Air Elemental, the Elemental is instantly disrupted.
>>
>Ah, that is all nice and wondeful Robert except that those munchkins with
>everything must be really loving you, because you didn't present them with
>drain codes, target numbers or anything, therefore if you have the spell
>(even
>at force 1), then it simply must work all the time, without failure. ;p

Uh, he said that the drain code was the same as Bullet Barrier, but
with a +2 to the DT. Since nothing ever said how strong the "airtight
seal" had to be, I'd say that successfully casting a force 1 spell
would work...

>On a more serious note, the spell that Robert is describing, has anyone come
>around with this? We've had a variation of it here, not for the Air
>Elemental
>vulnerability, but for the Vampires in Mist Form and the Knock Out Gasses
>that
>always bothered us.
>
>We just "upped" the drain for a "Barrier" spell by one level, to
represent
>the
>ability to fully effect a given "Elemental Effect" completely. I think that
>would make the spell a [(F/2)+2D] based upon that presumption.

Well, I wouldn't say that it's an elemental effect. It affects
elementals, but that's something completely different.

James Ojaste

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.